Optic Nerve Head Characteristics in Chronic Angle Closure Glaucoma Detected by Swept-Source OCT.

TitleOptic Nerve Head Characteristics in Chronic Angle Closure Glaucoma Detected by Swept-Source OCT.
Publication TypeJournal Article
Year of Publication2017
AuthorsLi D, Li T, Paschalis EI, Wang H, Taniguchi EV, Choo Z-N, Shoji MK, Greenstein SH, Brauner SC, Turalba AV, Pasquale LR, Shen LQ
JournalCurr Eye Res
Volume42
Issue11
Pagination1450-1457
Date Published2017 11
ISSN1460-2202
KeywordsAged, Bruch Membrane, Chronic Disease, Cross-Sectional Studies, Female, Glaucoma, Angle-Closure, Glaucoma, Open-Angle, Humans, Imaging, Three-Dimensional, Intraocular Pressure, Male, Optic Disk, Optic Nerve Diseases, Prospective Studies, Tomography, Optical Coherence, Visual Field Tests, Visual Fields
Abstract

PURPOSE: To compare structural features in prelaminar and laminar tissues of the optic nerve head (ONH) in chronic angle closure glaucoma (CACG), primary open angle glaucoma (POAG), and control subjects.

MATERIALS AND METHODS: ONH imaging was performed using swept-source optical coherence tomography (SS-OCT) for measurements of minimum rim width at Bruch's membrane opening (BMO-MRW), horizontal, and vertical lamina cribrosa depth (LCD). Prelaminar defects, categorized as hole and wedge, and lamina cribrosa (LC) defects were identified. Enhanced depth imaging spectral domain OCT (EDI-OCT) customized to perform high-resolution volume scans was used in conjunction to further characterize prelaminar holes. One eye per subject was analyzed.

RESULTS: Eighty subjects (20 CACG, 40 POAG, and 20 controls) were included in the study. CACG and POAG groups had similar mean deviation on Humphrey visual field testing (-6.9 ± 5.1 vs. -6.3 ± 6.0 dB, p > 0.05) and IOP on the day of imaging (14.0 ± 3.1 vs. 13.8 ± 2.7 mmHg, p > 0.05). Thinnest and global BMO-MRW in CACG (120.3 ± 44.8, 225.5 ± 53.9 μm) and POAG (109.7 ± 56.3, 213.8 ± 59.7 μm) groups were lower than controls (200.1 ± 40.8, 308.3 ± 70.8 μm; p < 0.001 for both). Prelaminar holes were most frequent in CACG (65.0%) than POAG (25.0%, p=0.008) or control groups (20.0%, p=0.01). After adjusting for demographic and ophthalmic covariates, CACG was associated with increased odds of having prelaminar holes compared to POAG (odds ratio, 9.79; 95% CI, 2.12-45.19; p=0.003). Hole volume was similar between CACG and POAG (p > 0.05), but the CACG group had more holes per scan than POAG (maximum 2.5 ± 1.9 vs. 1.2 ± 0.4, p=0.02). Prelaminar wedge defects were less common in the CACG than the POAG group (5.0% vs. 37.5%, p=0.02). The CACG group did not differ from controls in laminar characteristics, such as LCD and LC defects.

CONCLUSIONS: SS-OCT evaluation of the ONH revealed more frequent prelaminar holes in CACG compared to POAG and control patients.

DOI10.1080/02713683.2017.1341535
Alternate JournalCurr. Eye Res.
PubMed ID28922031