Effects of angiotensin-neprilysin inhibition compared to angiotensin inhibition on ventricular arrhythmias in reduced ejection fraction patients under continuous remote monitoring of implantable defibrillator devices.

TitleEffects of angiotensin-neprilysin inhibition compared to angiotensin inhibition on ventricular arrhythmias in reduced ejection fraction patients under continuous remote monitoring of implantable defibrillator devices.
Publication TypeJournal Article
Year of Publication2018
Authorsde Diego C, González-Torres L, Núñez JMaría, Inda RCenturión, Martin-Langerwerf DA, Sangio AD, Chochowski P, Casasnovas P, Blazquéz JC, Almendral J
JournalHeart Rhythm
Volume15
Issue3
Pagination395-402
Date Published2018 Mar
ISSN1556-3871
Abstract

BACKGROUND: Angiotensin-neprilysin inhibition compared to angiotensin inhibition decreased sudden cardiac death in patients with reduced ejection fraction heart failure (rEFHF). The precise mechanism remains unclear.

OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to explore the effect of angiotensin-neprilysin inhibition on ventricular arrhythmias compared to angiotensin inhibition in rEFHF patients with an implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD) and remote monitoring.

METHODS: We prospectively included 120 patients with ICD and (1) New York Heart Association functional class ≥II; (2) left ventricular ejection fraction ≤40%; and (3) remote monitoring. For 9 months, patients received 100% angiotensin inhibition with angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor (ACEi) or angiotensin receptor blocker (ARB), beta-blockers, and mineraloid antagonist. Subsequently, ACEi or ARB was changed to sacubitril-valsartan in all patients, who were followed for 9 months. Appropriate shocks, nonsustained ventricular tachycardia (NSVT), premature ventricular contraction (PVC) burden, and biventricular pacing percentage were analyzed.

RESULTS: Patients were an average age of 69 ± 8 years and had mean left ventricular ejection fraction of 30.4% ± 4% (82% ischemic). Use of beta-blockers (98%), mineraloid antagonist (97%) and antiarrhythmic drugs was similar before and after sacubitril-valsartan. Sacubitril-valsartan significantly decreased NSVT episodes (5.4 ± 0.5 vs 15 ± 1.7 in angiotensin inhibition; P <.002), sustained ventricular tachycardia, and appropriate ICD shocks (0.8% vs 6.7% in angiotensin inhibition; P <.02). PVCs per hour decreased after sacubitril-valsartan (33 ± 12 vs 78 ± 15 in angiotensin inhibition; P <.0003) and was associated with increased biventricular pacing percentage (from 95% ± 6% to 98.8% ± 1.3%; P <.02).

CONCLUSION: Angiotensin-neprilysin inhibition decreased ventricular arrhythmias and appropriate ICD shocks in rEFHF patients under home monitoring compared to angiotensin inhibition.

DOI10.1016/j.hrthm.2017.11.012
Alternate JournalHeart Rhythm
PubMed ID29146274

Person Type: